{"id":11628,"date":"2018-11-05T06:10:01","date_gmt":"2018-11-05T10:10:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/?p=11628"},"modified":"2018-11-03T15:24:18","modified_gmt":"2018-11-03T19:24:18","slug":"morphun-115-ray-jackendoff-on-relational-morphology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2018\/11\/05\/morphun-115-ray-jackendoff-on-relational-morphology\/","title":{"rendered":"MorPhun 11\/5: Ray Jackendoff on Relational Morphology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker: Ray Jackendoff (Tufts\/MIT) and Jenny Audring (Leiden)<br clear='none'\/>\n Title: The Texture of the Lexicon: Relational Morphology in the Parallel Architecture <br clear='none'\/>\n Date and time: Monday 11\/5, 5-6pm <br clear=\"none\" \/><br clear='none'\/>\n Location: 32-D831 <br clear=\"none\" \/><br clear='none'\/>\n Abstract:<\/p>\n<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 1\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p>Linguistic theory has emphasized Humboldt\u0092s \u0093infinite use of finite means,\u0094 to the relative neglect of the \u0093finite means,\u0094 i.e. the lexicon. What does a language user store in the lexicon,and in what form? We explore this question in the context of the Parallel Architecture (Jackendoff 1997, 2002; Culicover and Jackendoff 2005). Within this outlook, lexical items are pieces of phonological, (morpho)syntactic, and semantic structures, and morphology is the grammar of word-sized pieces of structure.<\/p>\n<p>Unlike classical syntactic patterns, the majority of morphological patterns are not productive, and their instances must be listed in the lexicon. They therefore present a number of important difficulties for a grammar formulated in terms of traditional rules. More adequate is a formulation in terms of schemas, along the lines of Construction Grammar and especially Construction Morphology. Nonproductive schemas do not build new structures; rather, they motivate relations among items stored in the lexicon.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to building novel structures, productive schemas can also motivate relations within the lexicon. This leads to a new perspective on productive patterns: the principles used to build novel structures are simply a subset of the schemas in the lexicon, and productive schemas canbe thought of as schemas \u0093gone viral.\u0094 We conclude that the focus in linguistic theory on the\u0093infinite use of finite means\u0094 has deflected attention from a more basic issue: the form of the lexicon and the relationships within it.<\/p>\n<p>This outlook on morphological relations in the lexicon has consequences for syntactic theory as well. First, it offers an account of nonproductive syntactic constructions \u0096 Culicover\u0092s (1999)\u0093syntactic nuts.\u0094 Second, it suggests a nontraditional approach to syntactic alternations, in which movement operations are replaced by relations between independent constructions. We will briefly mention some possible cases.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker: Ray Jackendoff (Tufts\/MIT) and Jenny Audring (Leiden) Title: The Texture of the Lexicon: Relational Morphology in the Parallel Architecture Date and time: Monday 11\/5, 5-6pm Location: 32-D831 Abstract: Linguistic theory has emphasized Humboldt\u0092s \u0093infinite use of finite means,\u0094 to the relative neglect of the \u0093finite means,\u0094 i.e. the lexicon. What does a language user [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-announcements"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11628"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11628\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11629,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11628\/revisions\/11629"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}