{"id":12097,"date":"2019-04-22T06:02:02","date_gmt":"2019-04-22T10:02:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/?p=12097"},"modified":"2019-04-21T20:16:16","modified_gmt":"2019-04-22T00:16:16","slug":"ling-lunch-4-25-tatiana-bondarenko-and-stanislao-zompi-mit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2019\/04\/22\/ling-lunch-4-25-tatiana-bondarenko-and-stanislao-zompi-mit\/","title":{"rendered":"Ling-Lunch 4\/25 - Tatiana Bondarenko and Stanislao Zompi (MIT)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Speaker<\/strong>:\u00a0Tatiana Bondarenko &amp; Stanislao Zomp\u00ed (MIT)<br><strong>Title<\/strong>:\u00a0Leftover Agreement in Kartvelian  <br><strong>Time<\/strong>:\u00a0Thursday, 4\/25, 12:30-1:50pm<br><strong>Location<\/strong>:\u00a032-D461 <br><br><strong>Abstract:\u00a0<\/strong><br> In this talk we argue that some  instances of agreement result from probes interacting with unspelled-out  features of lower agreement probes. We call such agreement Leftover  Agreement, and show how it can account for the observed  variation in number agreement across the four Kartvelian languages.<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns has-2-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">  (1) a.\u00a0\u00a0Georgian\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <br><strong>            gv-<\/strong>naxa<br><strong>           1PL<\/strong>-see.AOR.3SG <br>  &#8216;She\/he saw us.&#8217;<br>            (Aronson 1990: 172)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0   <\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">b.\u00a0\u00a0Svan<br><strong>n<\/strong>-\u00e4dgari<br><strong>1PL.IN<\/strong>-kill.PRS<br> &#8216;She\/he is killing us.\u0092<br> \u00a0(Testelets  1989: 9) (2)          <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns has-2-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-8f761849 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">            a.\u00a0\u00a0Laz  <br>           <strong>m<\/strong>-dziom-<strong>an<\/strong><br>           <strong>1<\/strong>-see.PRS-<strong>PL<\/strong> <br>           &#8216;She\/he sees us.&#8217;<br>           (Lacroix 2009: 294)  <br><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"> b.\u00a0\u00a0Megrelian<br><strong> m<\/strong>-t?\u0092argn-<strong>a(n)<\/strong><br> <strong>1<\/strong>-write.PRS-<strong>PL<\/strong> <br> &#8216;She\/he writes us.\u0092<br> \u00a0(Kipshidze  1914: 076)  <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"> In  Georgian and Svan, (1),\u00a0the lower probe (the prefix) spells out both  first-person and plural features of the object, so the higher probe (the  suffix)  does not find anything left over to agree with. In Laz and Megrelian,  (2), however, the lower probe has spelled out only the person, but not  the number feature of the object. This leftover feature is being agreed  with and spelled out by a higher probe (the  suffix\u00a0<em>-an<\/em>\u00a0\/\u00a0<em>-a(n)<\/em>).\u00a0<br> \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In  our talk, we will spell out our assumptions about the Kartvelian  agreement system and discuss our implementation of Leftover Agreement,  compare our proposal to other approaches (Halle &amp; Marantz 1993,  Harley &amp; Lomashvili 2011, Blix 2016, Foley 2017, Thivierge 2018,  a.o.), and show how it can be extended to the \u0093inverse\u0094 agreement  alignment with minimal changes. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker:\u00a0Tatiana Bondarenko &amp; Stanislao Zomp\u00ed (MIT)Title:\u00a0Leftover Agreement in Kartvelian Time:\u00a0Thursday, 4\/25, 12:30-1:50pmLocation:\u00a032-D461 Abstract:\u00a0 In this talk we argue that some instances of agreement result from probes interacting with unspelled-out features of lower agreement probes. We call such agreement Leftover Agreement, and show how it can account for the observed variation in number agreement across the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12097","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-announcements"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12097","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12097"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12097\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12105,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12097\/revisions\/12105"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12097"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12097"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12097"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}