{"id":12155,"date":"2019-05-06T06:06:25","date_gmt":"2019-05-06T10:06:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/?p=12155"},"modified":"2019-05-06T18:41:50","modified_gmt":"2019-05-06T22:41:50","slug":"lf-reading-group-5-8-tanya-bondarenko-mit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2019\/05\/06\/lf-reading-group-5-8-tanya-bondarenko-mit\/","title":{"rendered":"LF Reading Group 5\/8 - Tanya Bondarenko (MIT)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Speaker:<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/tbond.scripts.mit.edu\/tb\/\">Tanya Bondarenko<\/a> (MIT)<br><strong>Title:<\/strong> From think to remember: the case of Buryat&#8217;s verb hanaxa<br><strong>Time:<\/strong> Wednesday, May 8th, 1-2PM<br><strong>Location:<\/strong> 32-D461<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Abstract:<\/strong> Barguzin Buryat has an attitude verb hanaxa, which is naturally translated as &#8220;think&#8221; when it takes CP clauses and as &#8220;remember&#8221; when it takes nominalized clauses. I show that this difference in translation correlates with a presence of a factive presupposition, (1)-(2), and argue that this factivity alternation arises not due to lexical ambiguity or nominal\/definite status of the complement, but rather due to the interaction between the argument structure of the verb and different ways of it composing with CPs and with NPs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker: Tanya Bondarenko (MIT)Title: From think to remember: the case of Buryat&#8217;s verb hanaxaTime: Wednesday, May 8th, 1-2PMLocation: 32-D461 Abstract: Barguzin Buryat has an attitude verb hanaxa, which is naturally translated as &#8220;think&#8221; when it takes CP clauses and as &#8220;remember&#8221; when it takes nominalized clauses. I show that this difference in translation correlates with [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12155","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-announcements"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12155","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12155"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12155\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":12168,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12155\/revisions\/12168"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12155"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12155"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12155"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}