{"id":13206,"date":"2020-02-18T06:06:57","date_gmt":"2020-02-18T11:06:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/?p=13206"},"modified":"2020-02-18T15:07:45","modified_gmt":"2020-02-18T20:07:45","slug":"lfrg-02-19-tanya-bonderanko-mit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2020\/02\/18\/lfrg-02-19-tanya-bonderanko-mit\/","title":{"rendered":"LFRG 02\/19 - Tanya Bonderanko (MIT)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Speaker: <\/strong>Tanya Bonderanko<br class=\"\" \/><br clear='none'\/>\n<strong>Title: <\/strong><em>Hyperraising and Logical Form: evidence from Buryat<\/em><br class=\"\" \/><br clear='none'\/>\n<strong>Time: <\/strong>Wednesday, 02\/19, 1pm - 2pm<br class=\"\" \/><br clear='none'\/>\n<strong>Location: <\/strong>32-D461<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abstract:<\/strong> Languages differ in whether they allow hyperraising to object:\u00a0 movement of an argument of an embedded finite clause into the matrix clause.\u00a0 Languages like Buryat (Mongolic) allow such movement, languages like English don&#8217;t:<\/p>\n<p>(1) a. bair\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0badm-i:j<span class=\"interactive IPA\">?-1 \u00a0[CP\u00a0\u00a0 t-1 \u00a0 sajan-i:j? \u00a0 \u00a0zura-xa \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 g?<\/span>?<span class=\"interactive IPA\">?]\u00a0 \u00a0 han-a:<br clear='none'\/>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Bair.NOM \u00a0Badma-ACC \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Sajana-ACC draw-FUT \u00a0COMP \u00a0think-PST<\/span><br clear='none'\/>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 `Bair thought that Badma will draw Sajana.&#8217;<br clear='none'\/>\nb. *Bair thought Badma-1 [CP that t-1 will draw Sajana].<\/p>\n<p>The question that arises is: what determines whether a language allows hyperraising to object?<\/p>\n<p>In this\u00a0work in progress, I would like to propose that the relevant factor is \u00a0the semantic type of the clause. I adopt\u00a0 Kratzer&#8217;s (2013) approach to semantics of attitude verbs and follow Deal (2018) in analyzing hyperraising as (potentially covert) raising into a theta-position. I propose that CPs come in two kinds: some, like Buryat CPs, denote properties of events (&lt;vt&gt;-CPs), others, like English CPs, denote properties of individuals (&lt;et&gt;-CPs). I argue that only &lt;vt&gt;-CPs can be hyperraised out of: due to the semantics of movement into a theta-position I propose, hyperraising out of &lt;et&gt;-CPs creates a type mismatch. This account automatically captures such properties of hyperraised arguments as inability to undergo reconstruction, obligatoriness of <em>de re<\/em> interpretation, and impossibility of indexical shifting.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker: Tanya Bonderanko Title: Hyperraising and Logical Form: evidence from Buryat Time: Wednesday, 02\/19, 1pm - 2pm Location: 32-D461 &nbsp; Abstract: Languages differ in whether they allow hyperraising to object:\u00a0 movement of an argument of an embedded finite clause into the matrix clause.\u00a0 Languages like Buryat (Mongolic) allow such movement, languages like English don&#8217;t: (1) [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":27,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-announcements"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/27"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13206"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13206\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13210,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13206\/revisions\/13210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}