{"id":15529,"date":"2023-04-18T06:06:00","date_gmt":"2023-04-18T10:06:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/?p=15529"},"modified":"2023-04-16T17:45:21","modified_gmt":"2023-04-16T21:45:21","slug":"lf-reading-group-4-19-omri-doron-mit-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2023\/04\/18\/lf-reading-group-4-19-omri-doron-mit-2\/","title":{"rendered":"LF Reading Group 4\/19 - Omri Doron (MIT)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Speaker: <\/strong> Omri Doron (MIT)<br class=\"\" \/><br clear='none'\/>\n<strong>Title: <\/strong>Hebrew nominal sentences wear their reconstruction on their sleeve<br class=\"\" \/><br clear='none'\/>\n<strong>Time: <\/strong>Wednesday, April 19th, 1pm - 2pm<br class=\"\" \/><br clear='none'\/>\n<br class=\"\" \/><br clear='none'\/>\n<strong>Abstract: <\/strong>Hebrew nominal sentences (with NP\/AP as a predicate) sometimes contain what looks like a pronoun between the subject and the predicate (\u0093Pron\u0094), which agrees with the subject:<\/p>\n<p>(1) dana (hi) gvoa<br clear='none'\/>\nDana (Pron.3FSG) tall<br clear='none'\/>\n\u0093Dana is tall\u0094<\/p>\n<p>Doron (1983) analyzes Pron as the realization of agreement features in I?, which is still considered the standard analysis of Pron. I point out that this analysis is unable to account for Pron\u0092s complicated distribution and interpretative effects, and argue for an alternative analysis of Pron as a resumptive pronoun. I then show that Pron\u0092s syntactic properties can be used to test different hypotheses in the literature regarding reconstruction effects.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker: Omri Doron (MIT) Title: Hebrew nominal sentences wear their reconstruction on their sleeve Time: Wednesday, April 19th, 1pm - 2pm Abstract: Hebrew nominal sentences (with NP\/AP as a predicate) sometimes contain what looks like a pronoun between the subject and the predicate (\u0093Pron\u0094), which agrees with the subject: (1) dana (hi) gvoa Dana (Pron.3FSG) [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":26,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-announcements"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/26"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15529"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15529\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15534,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15529\/revisions\/15534"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}