{"id":2190,"date":"2011-02-14T05:01:35","date_gmt":"2011-02-14T10:01:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/?p=2190"},"modified":"2011-02-11T15:00:47","modified_gmt":"2011-02-11T20:00:47","slug":"ling-lunch-217-jessica-coon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2011\/02\/14\/ling-lunch-217-jessica-coon\/","title":{"rendered":"Ling-Lunch 2\/17 - Jessica Coon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker: Jessica Coon (Harvard)<br clear='none'\/>\nTitle: The role of Case in A-bar extraction asymmetries: Evidence from Mayan<br clear='none'\/>\nTime: Thursday, February 17, 12:30pm<br clear='none'\/>\nLocation: 32-D461<br clear='none'\/>\n(Collaborative work with Pedro Mateo Pedro and Omer Preminger.)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em><\/p>\n<p>Many morphologically ergative languages display asymmetries in the extraction of core arguments, sometimes referred to as \u0093syntactic ergativity\u0094: while absolutive arguments (transitive objects and intransitive subjects) extract freely, ergative arguments (transitive subjects) cannot (see e.g. Dixon 1972, 1974; Manning 1996). This is the case in many languages of the Mayan family. In order to extract agents (for focus, question, or relativization), a special construction known as the &#8220;Agent Focus&#8221; (AF) must be used. These AF constructions have been described as syntactically and semantically transitive, because they contain two non-oblique DP arguments, but morphologically intransitive because the verb appears with only a single agreement marker and takes the intransitive status suffix (Aissen 1999; Stiebels 2006). Though AF constructions have been the topic of much recent work, there is no consensus on how to best analyze them. To complicate matters, in languages of the Q&#8217;anjob&#8217;alan branch of the Mayan family, the Agent Focus morphology has been extended to another domain: non-finite transitives. This construction is known in Mayanist circles as the &#8220;Crazy Antipassive&#8221;, and to this point it has remained unexplained.<\/p>\n<p>In this paper we offer a proposal for (i) why some morphologically ergative languages exhibit extraction asymmetries, while others do not; and (ii) how the AF construction circumvents this problem. Through a comparison of Q&#8217;anjob&#8217;al and Chol we argue for an analysis which unifies the two environments which trigger AF morphology in Q&#8217;anjob&#8217;al. We propose further that the inability to extract ergative arguments does <\/em>not<em> reflect a problem with the ergative subject, but rather is a problem with how <\/em>absolutive<em> arguments are licensed in the clause. We argue that the AF morpheme <\/em>-on<em> circumvents this problem by <\/em>assigning Case to internal arguments<em>. We show how the appearance of intransitive verbal morphology is connected to this change in Case-assignment properties of these clauses.<\/p>\n<p><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker: Jessica Coon (Harvard) Title: The role of Case in A-bar extraction asymmetries: Evidence from Mayan Time: Thursday, February 17, 12:30pm Location: 32-D461 (Collaborative work with Pedro Mateo Pedro and Omer Preminger.) Many morphologically ergative languages display asymmetries in the extraction of core arguments, sometimes referred to as \u0093syntactic ergativity\u0094: while absolutive arguments (transitive objects [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2190","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-talks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2190","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2190"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2190\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2192,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2190\/revisions\/2192"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2190"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}