{"id":3281,"date":"2011-11-15T05:01:37","date_gmt":"2011-11-15T09:01:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/?p=3281"},"modified":"2011-11-16T13:39:36","modified_gmt":"2011-11-16T17:39:36","slug":"ling-lunch-1117-timothy-j-odonnell","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2011\/11\/15\/ling-lunch-1117-timothy-j-odonnell\/","title":{"rendered":"Ling-Lunch 11\/17 - Timothy J. O&#8217;Donnell"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker: Timothy J. O&#8217;Donnell (MIT)<br clear='none'\/>\nTitle: Productivity and Reuse in Language<br clear='none'\/>\nDate\/Time: Thursday, Nov 17, 12:30-1:45p<br clear='none'\/>\nLocation: 32-D461<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>A much-celebrated aspect of language is the way in which it allows us to make &#8220;infinite use of finite means.&#8221; This property is made<br clear='none'\/>\npossible because language is fundamentally a computational system: Novel expressions can be composed out of a large inventory of stored, reusable parts.<\/p>\n<p>For any given language, however, there are many more potential ways of forming novel expressions than are actually used in<br clear='none'\/>\npractice. For example, English contains suffixes which are highly generalizable (e.g., -ness; Lady-Gagaesqueness,<br clear='none'\/>\npine-scentedness) and suffixes which can only be reused in specific words, and cannot be generalized (e.g., -th; truth, width, warmth).How are such differences in generalizability and reusability represented? How can the child acquire this system of knowledge? This<br clear='none'\/>\nset of related questions can be called the &#8220;problem of productivity.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I will discuss a mathematical model of productivity and reuse which addresses the problem by treating it as a structure-by-structure inference in a Bayesian framework. I will compare this model to four other probabilistic models which formalize historical proposals from linguistics and psycholinguistics.<\/p>\n<p>I will discuss the evaluation of these proposals on two very different sub-systems of English morphology: the English past tense, which is characterized by a sharp dichotomy in productivity between regular (i.e., -ed) and irregular (e.g., sing\/sang) forms, and English derivational morphology, which is characterized by greater variability in productivity: from wholly productive (e.g., -ness), to productive in certain contexts (e.g., -ity; agreeability), to completely unproductive (e.g., -th). I will discuss several different aspects of the development and the adult state of these two systems, possibly including developmental overregularization, suffix ordering phenomena, and the generalizability of suffix combinations. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker: Timothy J. O&#8217;Donnell (MIT) Title: Productivity and Reuse in Language Date\/Time: Thursday, Nov 17, 12:30-1:45p Location: 32-D461 A much-celebrated aspect of language is the way in which it allows us to make &#8220;infinite use of finite means.&#8221; This property is made possible because language is fundamentally a computational system: Novel expressions can be composed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3281","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-talks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3281","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3281"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3281\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3358,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3281\/revisions\/3358"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3281"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3281"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3281"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}