{"id":3301,"date":"2011-11-15T05:00:03","date_gmt":"2011-11-15T09:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/?p=3301"},"modified":"2011-11-15T00:55:39","modified_gmt":"2011-11-15T04:55:39","slug":"mit-goes-to-nels","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2011\/11\/15\/mit-goes-to-nels\/","title":{"rendered":"MIT goes to NELS"},"content":{"rendered":"

Last Friday through Sunday, a goodly group of MIT linguists traveled to Toronto for NELS 42<\/a><\/strong>, hosted by the University of Toronto. All told, six talks were presented by our graduate students, in addition to David Pesetsky’s invited talk (one of four reflecting the conference theme “Diversity and universals: The role of typology and linguistic universals in linguistic theory”). The other invited speakers were Mark Baker<\/a>, Lisa Matthewson, and Martina Wiltschko.<\/p>\n

On Friday. Bronwyn Bjorkman<\/strong><\/a> and Claire Halpert<\/strong><\/a> presented their paper “In search of (im)perfection: the illusion of counterfactual aspect”<\/a>, Rafael Nonato<\/strong><\/a> argued that “Clause-chaining is coordination”<\/a> (on the basis of striking similarities between Kis\u00eadj\u00ea and English), and David Pesetsky<\/strong><\/a> presented an invited talk on why we should view “Dependent Case as Binding Theory”<\/a>. On Saturday, Suyeon Yun<\/strong> gave her talk on “Opacity and serial phonology-morphology interaction in Kyungsang Korean”<\/a>. On Sunday, Yusuke Imanishi<\/strong><\/a> told the audience “How to merge possessor WH in Kaqchikel (Mayan): A non-uniform merge of argument WH<\/a>”, Claire Halpert<\/a> spoke on “Structural case and the nature of vP in Zulu<\/a>”, and Jeremy Hartman<\/strong><\/a> presented his paper “Parallel movement and (non-)intervention by experiencers<\/a>”. We’re biased, but we think their talks were fantastic. There were interesting, tough questions after the talks, and lively discussion.
\n\n\t\t