{"id":3780,"date":"2012-03-05T05:02:40","date_gmt":"2012-03-05T09:02:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/?p=3780"},"modified":"2012-03-05T05:49:36","modified_gmt":"2012-03-05T09:49:36","slug":"phonology-circle-37-peter-graff-and-emad-taliep","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2012\/03\/05\/phonology-circle-37-peter-graff-and-emad-taliep\/","title":{"rendered":"Phonology Circle 3\/7 - Peter Graff and Emad Taliep"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><P>This Wednesday&#8217;s installment of the Phonology Circle features a talk by Peter Graff and Emad Taliep.  They will also be presenting the same talk earlier in the day, at Wednesday 10am in TedLab.<\/P><\/p>\n<p><P>Speakers: Peter Graff and Emad Taliep<br clear='none'\/>\nTitle: English Speakers Track Absolute Frequency in Consonant Co-occurrence<BR><br clear='none'\/>\nDate: March 7 (Wednesday)<BR><br clear='none'\/>\nTime: 5:00\u00967:00<BR><br clear='none'\/>\nLocation: 32D831<\/P><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><P>Phonotactic wellformedness has been shown to affect behavior in a<br clear='none'\/>\nvariety of linguistic tasks such as word-likeness judgments (e.g.,<br clear='none'\/>\nColeman and Pierrehumbert 1997). However, different researchers have<br clear='none'\/>\noften employed rather different measures for phonotactic<br clear='none'\/>\nwellformedness. This is particularly evident in the literature on<br clear='none'\/>\nconsonant co-occurrence where two distinct measures of the<br clear='none'\/>\nwellformedness of constellations of consonants separated by vowels<br clear='none'\/>\n(e.g., p_t in pat) have been hypothesized. The first measure is the<br clear='none'\/>\njoint probability (i.e., absolute frequency) of the constellation<br clear='none'\/>\nP(C1_C2). Studies have found, e.g., that the joint probability of<br clear='none'\/>\nlabial-coronal constellations (e.g. pat) is greater than the joint<br clear='none'\/>\nprobability of coronal-labial ones (e.g. tap) in many different<br clear='none'\/>\nlanguages (MacNeilage et. al 1999, Carrissimo-Bertola 2010) and<br clear='none'\/>\nchildren as young as 7 months have been shown to be sensitive to this<br clear='none'\/>\nphonotactic (Nazzi et al. 2009, Gonzalez Gomez and Nazzi 2012). The<br clear='none'\/>\nsecond measure of wellformedness often employed is the observed-<br clear='none'\/>\noverexpected ratio (O\/E) also known as pointwise mutual information<br clear='none'\/>\n(PMI). The difference between PMI and joint probability is that PMI<br clear='none'\/>\nrelativizes the joint probability of a constellation to the<br clear='none'\/>\nindependent probabilities of its parts such that PMI(C1;C2) =<br clear='none'\/>\nlog(P(C1_C2)\/(P(C1)\u00b7P(C2))), i.e. log(O\/E). PMI has been hypothesized<br clear='none'\/>\nas a measure of wellformedness in studies of OCP-Place type phenomena<br clear='none'\/>\n(e.g. Frisch et al. 2004, Coetzee and Pater 2008) and PMI-based<br clear='none'\/>\ngeneralizations have been shown to affect wordlikeness judgments in<br clear='none'\/>\nlanguages like Arabic (Frisch and Zawaydeh, 2001). In this study, we<br clear='none'\/>\ncompare the patterning of PMI and joint probability in the English<br clear='none'\/>\nlexicon and show that English CVCs present an ideal test-case for<br clear='none'\/>\ndisambiguating the two measures. We present results from an online<br clear='none'\/>\nwordlikeness judgment study (N=50) and find that speakers\u0092 judgments<br clear='none'\/>\nare more accurately predicted by joint probability (i.e., absolute<br clear='none'\/>\nfrequency) than PMI.<\/P><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This Wednesday&#8217;s installment of the Phonology Circle features a talk by Peter Graff and Emad Taliep. They will also be presenting the same talk earlier in the day, at Wednesday 10am in TedLab. Speakers: Peter Graff and Emad Taliep Title: English Speakers Track Absolute Frequency in Consonant Co-occurrence Date: March 7 (Wednesday) Time: 5:00\u00967:00 Location: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3780","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-talks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3780","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3780"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3780\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3782,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3780\/revisions\/3782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3780"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3780"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3780"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}