{"id":46,"date":"2008-02-11T05:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-02-11T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/2008\/02\/11\/this-weeks-linglunch-omer-preminger\/"},"modified":"2008-02-10T20:06:10","modified_gmt":"2008-02-11T01:06:10","slug":"this-weeks-linglunch-omer-preminger","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2008\/02\/11\/this-weeks-linglunch-omer-preminger\/","title":{"rendered":"This week&#8217;s LingLunch: Omer Preminger"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Mark your calendar to come and join us this Thursday for a Ling-lunch talk by:<\/p>\n<p>Omer Preminger (MIT)<br clear='none'\/>\n&#8220;Basque Ling-Lunch Redux.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>WHEN: Feb 14, 12:30<br clear='none'\/>\nWHERE: 32-D461<\/p>\n<p>ABSTRACT:<\/p>\n<p>Part II of the Basque Ling-Lunch series will begin with a recap of  Episode One<br clear='none'\/>\n- attendance of previous talk will *not* be assumed! -  where it was shown that<br clear='none'\/>\napparent cases of Long-Distance Agreement  (LDA) in dialectal Basque do not in<br clear='none'\/>\nfact constitute a case of true LDA  (construed as agreement that spans across<br clear='none'\/>\nthe boundaries of established locality domains). I provide evidence that the<br clear='none'\/>\ncases in  question fall into one of two categories: either (i) the apparent<br clear='none'\/>\nLDA  relation is comprised of two separate agreement relations, &#8220;stacked&#8221;  on<br clear='none'\/>\ntop of one another, each of which is perfectly well-behaved with  respect to<br clear='none'\/>\nthe relevant locality restrictions; or (ii) the agreement relation in question<br clear='none'\/>\nspans the boundaries of neither DP nor CP, and is thus typologically<br clear='none'\/>\nunexceptional.<\/p>\n<p>In this brand new episode, I turn to the distinction between Agree  (conceived<br clear='none'\/>\nof as a relation between a probing head and a goal) and  clitic-doubling<br clear='none'\/>\n(conceived of as the generating of a clitic which is  matched in phi-features<br clear='none'\/>\nwith a full argument DP). Certain asymmetries  in the reach of so-called LDA<br clear='none'\/>\nwhen targeting dative noun-phrases and targeting absolutive ones suggest that<br clear='none'\/>\nabsolutive agreement is an  instance of Agree proper, whereas the dative (and<br clear='none'\/>\nergative) exponents  on the auxiliary are the result of clitic-doubling. In<br clear='none'\/>\nthe climactic  finale, I present an independent diagnostic for distinguishing<br clear='none'\/>\nAgree  from clitic-doubling: when so-called LDA fails to obtain, the<br clear='none'\/>\nagreement-bearing form of the auxiliary is obviously ruled out; the question is<br clear='none'\/>\nwhether what shows up is default agreement on the corresponding exponent, or<br clear='none'\/>\nrather an auxiliary form that lacks the  relevant exponent altogether. I show<br clear='none'\/>\nthat precisely in those relations  hypothesized here to be Agree relations,<br clear='none'\/>\nfailure of the relation  results in default agreement-whereas in those<br clear='none'\/>\nrelations hypothesized  here to be clitic-doubling, failure results in the<br clear='none'\/>\nwholesale absence  of the relevant exponent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mark your calendar to come and join us this Thursday for a Ling-lunch talk by: Omer Preminger (MIT) &#8220;Basque Ling-Lunch Redux.&#8221; WHEN: Feb 14, 12:30 WHERE: 32-D461 ABSTRACT: Part II of the Basque Ling-Lunch series will begin with a recap of Episode One - attendance of previous talk will *not* be assumed! - where it [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-talks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}