{"id":6229,"date":"2014-09-02T05:09:49","date_gmt":"2014-09-02T09:09:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/?p=6229"},"modified":"2014-09-01T22:21:48","modified_gmt":"2014-09-02T02:21:48","slug":"lfrg-92-dorothy-ahn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2014\/09\/02\/lfrg-92-dorothy-ahn\/","title":{"rendered":"LFRG 9\/4 - Dorothy Ahn"},"content":{"rendered":"

Speaker: Dorothy Ahn (Harvard)
\nTitle: Semantics of focus particles too and either
\nDate\/Time: Thursday, September 4, 5:30-7p
\nLocation: 34-D461<\/p>\n

\n

Additive either is an NPI that appears clause-finally in sentences like (1).<\/p>\n

(1) John didn\u0092t leave. Bill didn\u0092t leave either.<\/br>
\n(2) *Bill left either.<\/p>\n

An adequate account must explain at least two main properties of additive either: a) its restricted distribution and b) the relation between the host \u0096 the clause containing either \u0096 and the antecedent \u0096 the clause preceding the host. Building on Rullmann\u0092s (2003) intuition that additive either is a negative counterpart of focus particle too, I first propose an analysis for too: it introduces an anaphoric variable q that requires an antecedent, and when applied to a proposition p, it asserts a conjunction of q and p. After discussing how this anaphoricity accounts for the relation between the host and the antecedent, I propose that additive either is a completely parallel disjunctive counterpart of too, with its meaning identical to too except that it asserts a disjunction between q and p. The restricted distribution of additive either is predicted to follow simply from the lexical entry of either once we adopt the exhaustification-based theory of NPIs (Chierchia, 2013) and assume thateither has the same domain and scalar alternatives of a regular disjunction.<\/p>\n

Chierchia, G. (2013). Logic in Grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention.<\/br>
\nRullmann, H. (2003). Additive particles and polarity. Journal of semantics, 20(4)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Speaker: Dorothy Ahn (Harvard) Title: Semantics of focus particles too and either Date\/Time: Thursday, September 4, 5:30-7p Location: 34-D461 Additive either is an NPI that appears clause-finally in sentences like (1). (1) John didn\u0092t leave. Bill didn\u0092t leave either. (2) *Bill left either. An adequate account must explain at least two main properties of additive […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6229","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-talks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6229","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6229"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6229\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6411,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6229\/revisions\/6411"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6229"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}