{"id":6510,"date":"2014-10-20T05:01:02","date_gmt":"2014-10-20T09:01:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/?p=6510"},"modified":"2014-10-20T10:38:13","modified_gmt":"2014-10-20T14:38:13","slug":"ling-lunch-1023-aron-hirsch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2014\/10\/20\/ling-lunch-1023-aron-hirsch\/","title":{"rendered":"Ling-Lunch 10\/23 - Aron Hirsch"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker: Aron Hirsch (MIT)<\/br><br clear='none'\/>\nTitle: Deconstructing exceptives<\/br><br clear='none'\/>\nDate\/Time:Thursday, October 23, 12:30-1:45pm<\/br><br clear='none'\/>\nLocation: 32-D461<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>This talk looks at the semantics of exceptive expressions like <em>but<\/em> and <em>other than<\/em>. Building on insights in Gajewski (2008, 2013), I pursue an analysis of exceptives as sharing a common semantic core: a form of subtraction. <em>But<\/em> in (1) takes John as its argument and returns the set of all entities (atomic or plural) which do not include John. The resultant meaning composes with <em>students<\/em> by Predicate Modification, yielding the set of students not including John. This set is the restrictor of <em>every<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>(1) Every student but John came.<\/p>\n<p>I will argue for an analysis of <em>but<\/em> as obligatorily strengthened by the Exh operator of Fox (2007). Exh is responsible for deriving the entailment in (1) that John did not come. The literature (in particular, Gajewski 2013) has pursued this approach, but with additional complications, which I will argue are avoidable.<\/p>\n<p>I will show how the analysis extends to account for further empirical puzzles, in particular the incompatibility of exceptives with <em>both<\/em>, <em>all<\/em> when there is a numeral present (Moltmann 1993), and singular definites. Each expression in (2) introduces a presupposition about the size of its restrictor: <em>the<\/em> presupposes uniqueness, <em>both<\/em> presupposes duality, and <em>all<\/em> six presupposes a cardinality of six. I will argue that presuppositions project universally out of alternatives over which Exh quantifies, and that the result is presupposition conflict in each of (2a-c).<\/p>\n<p>(2) a. *Both students but John came.<\/br><br clear='none'\/>\nb. *All six students but John came.<\/br><br clear='none'\/>\nc. *The student but John came.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, I will show that the analysis sheds light on the typology of exceptives. <em>But<\/em> and <em>other than<\/em> are both a spell-out of the subtraction operator. The dimension on which they differ is that the <em>but<\/em> allomorph can only occur with Exh, while <em>other than<\/em> can occur with or without Exh. The availability of a parse without Exh will account for the freer distribution of <em>other than<\/em> than <em>but<\/em> and its fewer entailments:<\/p>\n<p>(3) Some student other than\/*but John came.<\/br><br clear='none'\/>\n(John could have come also, or not.)<\/br><br clear='none'\/>\nThree students other than\/*but John came.<\/br>  (John could have come also, or not.)<\/p>\n<p>I will motivate the claim that other than is nonetheless optionally strengthened by testing for a parse with Exh using Hurford&#8217;s disjunctions.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Speaker: Aron Hirsch (MIT) Title: Deconstructing exceptives Date\/Time:Thursday, October 23, 12:30-1:45pm Location: 32-D461 This talk looks at the semantics of exceptive expressions like but and other than. Building on insights in Gajewski (2008, 2013), I pursue an analysis of exceptives as sharing a common semantic core: a form of subtraction. But in (1) takes John [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6510","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-talks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6510","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6510"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6510\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6527,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6510\/revisions\/6527"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6510"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6510"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6510"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}