{"id":80,"date":"2008-03-31T05:00:59","date_gmt":"2008-03-31T10:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/whamit.mit.edu\/2008\/03\/31\/phonology-circle-gillian-gallagher\/"},"modified":"2008-03-30T09:58:30","modified_gmt":"2008-03-30T14:58:30","slug":"phonology-circle-gillian-gallagher","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/2008\/03\/31\/phonology-circle-gillian-gallagher\/","title":{"rendered":"Phonology Circle 3\/31: Gillian Gallagher"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Phonology Circle returns this week with a presentation will be by Gillian Gallagher<BR><br clear='none'\/>\nTitle: Identity and laryngeal phonotactics<BR><br clear='none'\/>\nTime: Mon Mar 31, 5pm, 32-D831<BR><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\nIn this talk, I look at phonotactic restrictions on the cooccurrence of laryngeal features (aspiration, ejection and implosion). Many languages disallow roots or words with two distinct consonants with the same laryngeal feature, *k&#8217;-t&#8217;. Some languages with this restriction also disallow identical consonants with the same laryngeal feature *k&#8217;-k&#8217;, while other languages allow identical consonants, k&#8217;-k&#8217;. I show that the (un)grammaticality of identical consonants sharing a laryngeal feature (k&#8217;-k&#8217;) correlates with the (un)grammaticality of consonants differing only in that laryngeal feature (k&#8217;-k). In all the languages in MacEachern&#8217;s (1999) survey, one of these forms is ungrammatical and one grammatical. The trading relationship is shown in (1).<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>   k&#8217;-k&#8217; <&#8212;> *k&#8217;-k<BR><br clear='none'\/>\n      *k&#8217;-k&#8217; <&#8212;> k&#8217;-k<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>I argue that the pattern in (1) results from the interaction of phonotactic constraints with *two* kinds of laryngeal faithfulness constraints: faithfulness to individual features (standard Ident[F] constraints) and faithfulness to word level laryngeal contrasts (this is a new idea).\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Phonology Circle returns this week with a presentation will be by Gillian Gallagher Title: Identity and laryngeal phonotactics Time: Mon Mar 31, 5pm, 32-D831 In this talk, I look at phonotactic restrictions on the cooccurrence of laryngeal features (aspiration, ejection and implosion). Many languages disallow roots or words with two distinct consonants with the same [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-80","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-talks"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ling-phil.mit.edu\/whamit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}