Whamit!

The Weekly Newsletter of MIT Linguistics

Issue of Monday, March 16th, 2009

Phonology Circle 3/16 - Maria Giavazzi

Speaker: Maria Giavazzi

Title: Output driven morpho-phonological alternations in the adjectival paradigm? Preliminary results from a study with French Huntington Disease patients.


Time: Mon 3/16, 5pm

Location: 32-D831

Ling Lunch 3/19 - Patrick Grosz

Join us for this week’s installment of Ling Lunch, featuring a presentation by Patrick Grosz:

Speaker: Patrick Grosz

Title: “Movement and Agreement in Right-Node Raising Constructions”

Time: Thurs 12:30-1:45

Place: 32-D461

MIT Linguistics Colloquium - Mar 20 - Anna Szabolcsi

Speaker: Anna Szabolcsi (NYU)

Title: Raising Verbs as Quantifiers

Time: Friday, Mar 20, 3:30-5:00pm

Place: 32-141

>Quantification over times and worlds in natural language is traditionally considered to be
syntactically implicit. More recently tenses and modals have been treated as syntactically explicit
quantifiers. I propose that new kind of evidence for the explicitly quantificational character of
raising verbs of the “begin” and “threaten” type can be obtained from their scope interaction with
the subject.

>Consider the following two scenarios:

>“HI scenario”

Who is getting good roles before April? Mary: no; Susan: no; Eva: yes

after April? Mary: yes; Susan: no; Eva: yes

>“LO scenario”

Who is getting good roles before April? Mary: yes/no; Susan: no; Eva: yes

after April? Mary: yes; Susan: no; Eva: no

>The following English sentence may describe either situation (the ambiguity is enhanced by the
presence of the temporal adjunct). Notice that HI and the LO readings are logically independent.

>In April only Mary began to get good roles.

HI: ‘only Mary went from not getting good roles to getting them’

LO: ‘it began to be the case that only Mary is getting good roles’

>Other languages, Hungarian and Shupamem among them, have verb-initial orders that
unambiguously carry the LO reading. They do that in two different ways. In Hungarian, “only
Mary” is a nominative subject inside the infinitival complement (see Szabolcsi 2009). This talk
will focus on the Shupamem type, where the fronting of “begin” appears to assign “begin” wide
scope over the operator subject that has properly raised to the tensed clause. I will argue that
“begin” does not only have quantificational content but explicitly quantifies over a time
argument. Possibly the argument carries over to “threaten” type verbs binding a world argument.

Kusumoto 2005, On the quantification over times in natural language. Natural language
Semantics 13: 317-357.

Lechner 2007, Interpretive effects of head movement. http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000178

Schlenker 2006, Ontological symmetry in language: A brief manifesto. Mind and Language 21:
504-539

Szabolcsi 2009, Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements in Hungarian. To appear in
den Dikken & Vago, eds. http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/jBkM2QxZ/

BCS Colloquium 3/20 - Herb Clark

Speaker: Herbert H. Clark (Stanford University)

Title: Rational Ways of Using Language

Time: Fri 3/20 4:00 PM, Singleton Auditorium, 46-3002

Ezra Keshet to Michigan

[Ezra Keshet](http://www.ezrakeshet.com/), MIT PhD 2008, has accepted a tenure track offer from the Linguistics Department at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, where he is currently a visiting assistant professor. Congratulations, Ezra!

Save the date: SNEWS on April 25 at UMass/Amherst

Mark your calendars! This year’s SNEWS (“Southern New England Workshop in Semantics”) will be held on Saturday, April 25th, at UMass/Amherst. It is an informal workshop where students can present their ongoing work. There are still slots available. If you are interested in presenting/participating, please contact Patrick at .

Detailed information will be posted on the website: .