Whamit!

The Weekly Newsletter of MIT Linguistics

Course announcement: 24.965 Morphology

24.965 Morphology

Instructors: Adam Albright and David Pesetsky

Meetings: Monday 2-5pm, 32-D461

Web site (to be populated shortly): http://stellar.mit.edu/S/course/24/fa10/24.965

Where does morphological structure come from, and why is it realized the way it is? What (if anything) distinguishes word structure from sentence structure?
Could it be claimed that “morphology is just a rule of syntax” (filtered
through some phonological constraints)? Why do theories of morphology so often posit mechanisms that go beyond what
appears necessary in theories of sentence structure? (That is, why do they so
often answer “no” to the previous question?)

Attempting to answer these questions leads us into some of the central problems
that analyses of morphological systems have grappled with:


  1. To the extent that morphological structure is predictable from syntactic
    structure, how? [Topics include: the Mirror Principle and scope-based ordering,
    in Athapaskan and beyond; nanosyntax]
  2. To the extent that morphological structure is constrained in a manner that
    does not directly follow from obvious facts about sentence syntax, what
    accounts for these effects? [Topics include: templates; phonologically
    motivated ordering; level ordering effects, the debate over phases and
    word-structure, complexity-based ordering]
  3. How do structurally simpler and more complex forms interact? [Topics
    include: blocking effects (syntax/morphology interactions, word/word
    interactions, phonologically driven interactions)]
  4. What accounts for complex relations between feature-specifications and their
    exponents? [Topics include: rules of referral, syncretism, fusion, fission,
    impoverishment, phonological markedness effects; inflection classes]
  5. What accounts for mismatches among phonologically, semantically and purely
    morphologically motivated word-structures [Topic: bracketing paradoxes]


The big question underlying the course will be: is there a distinct
morphological grammar, or can morphological phenomena all be understood as
arising from the interaction of syntax and phonology?

Requirements: three in-class presentations, short paper based on one of them